On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 04:08:26 -0700 (PDT) bwright <bwright...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How long do we want to hold up decisions. Are we just going to sit > here complaining about a voting system into the next year and have 0% > productivity isn't that the standard outcome of the democratic process? (little progress and lots of opinion.) > or are we going to do something. I don't understand the negative attitude to the meritocracy concept in this group. Do something. If done well people will help and follow. If done badly it will die or fork - in which case the process starts again. > I have noticed the > active participants are voting and the active members are the ones > that get the choice. If you are not an active member or you do not > wish to vote you will simply not be counted since you are not > participating. It is your choice. If I recall correctly, the number of members in 2010 quoted in the notification that the AU-LoCo was not "re-endorsed" was something like 14. The all time high was what? 64? 64 people should be able to resolve the situation where there is a single spokesperson and people who are doing good stuff can continue to do good stuff. 18 people to represent 14 is kingdom building gone mad. -- jmo -- ubuntu-au mailing list ubuntu-au@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au