Colin, see the bug #34089 for reference to what we do for BACKPORTS. Anyway it's wrong because it's not allowing us to superseded version in BACKPORTS pocket itself, this fix wil be easy, but as you've pointed it might be entirely wrong.
What do you think ? -- Backport is rejected if an older backport is already there https://launchpad.net/bugs/58144 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
