Same with Mantic.
On 10/30/23 15:09, Thomas Ward wrote:
The only thing in Lunar's backports are the `cockpit` package, I
forget did we give that an exception?
Thomas
On 10/30/23 10:58, Thomas Ward wrote:
I'll take a look at Lunar (didn't that just release though...?) as I
have a server related task for that to work on.
Thomas
-----Original Message-----
From: ubuntu-backports <ubuntu-backports-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com> On
Behalf Of Dan Streetman
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023 10:55 AM
To: Backports Discussion <ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com>
Subject: allowing backports into non-LTS releases
I'd like to propose changing our rules to allow - but not require -
backports into non-LTS releases. I think it makes sense to allow
this, so the benefit of backports can be provided in non-LTS releases
as well.
As we currently do have backports in the non-LTS lunar and mantic
queues, and we've rescheduled our next meeting until the end of next
month, if you have time @teward and @mapreri I'd like to discuss over
the ML, so we can accept (or reject) the non-LTS uploads.
Thanks!
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
