On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 09:51 -0700, Brian Murray wrote: > ----- Forwarded message from Nick Ellery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- > > Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:46:30 -0700 > From: Nick Ellery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Brian Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: nick.ellery wants to join [snip] > 5. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224031
It's good that he marked the bug "Invalid". However, this bug doesn't reflect much on how Nick judges setting status/importance of bug reports. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223755 Hrm, Nick asked the reporter to post a screenshot of the translation error but a screenshot was already provided. This bug has since sat in an Incomplete state waiting for a screenshot that was already provided. I'd like to see how Nick would continue triaging the bug (for ex what status and importance he'd choose etc). > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223496 It was good he commented that this was more of a support issue and directed him to the forums. However, when the reporter replied asking how to unsubscribe from the bug it would have been nice for Nick to tell him how to do this just so the reporter would know for future reference. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224037 Hrm, the reporter commented that this bug was resolved with the Hardy kernel but still an issue in Gutsy. This will probably not qualify for a Gutsy SRU. The reporter also comments they are using the Hardy kernel from a Gutsy install, it would be good to inquire why they haven't fully upgraded to Hardy. Also, kernel bugs should only be assigned to the kernel team once the status and importance have been set. From the activity log it looks like Nick just assigned the kernel team but left the bug in a New/Undecided state. Additionally, Nick didn't ask for any of the minimal kernel debugging information, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeamBugPolicies , as typically requested by the kernel team. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/126579 He commented that this is a "Wishlist" report but marked it "Invalid". Otherwise it was nice he pointed them to brainstorm.ubuntu.com I'll have to Nack this application as well. I think he needs to do a little more triaging. It would be good to see how he does with setting Status/Importance of bugs. It would also be good to see how he goes about getting more debugging information from reporters as well. Thanks, Leann _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : ubuntu-bugcontrol@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/people/+me/+editemails More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
