On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 03:51:18PM -0700, Bryan McLellan wrote: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/~btm > > > Do you promise to be polite to bug reporters even if they are rude > > to you or Ubuntu? Have you signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct? > > Yes. Yes. > > > Have you read Bugs/HowToTriage, Bugs/Assignment, Bugs/Status and > > Bugs/Importance? Do you have any questions about that documentation? > > Yes. No. > > > What sensitive data should you look for in a private Apport crash > > report bug before making it public? See Bugs/HowToTriage for more > > information. > > The core dump still being attached as the result of the stack trace > not being complete.
Private information can also appear in the stack trace or the threaded stack trace so those also should be checked for private information. > > Is there a particular package or group of packages that you are > > interested in helping out with? > > ubuntu-server, ubuntu-virt > > > Please list of five or more bugs which you have triaged. These bugs > > should demonstrate your understanding of the triage process and how > > to properly handle bugs. If there is a bug in your list that does > > not have an importance indicate what importance you would give it > > after becoming a member of Ubuntu Bug Control. > > Please use urls in your list of bugs. > > This list should intentionally exclude bugs that I filed. > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgems-ruby/+bug/302990 You provided lots of information to this bug report which is quite helpful for everyone! > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dhcp3/+bug/351378 -- > Importance: Wishlist Again you've done some great research here which I think is quite useful. This bug would probably benefit from forwarding to Debian though. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpgsql-ruby/+bug/290648 -- > Importance: Wishlist This looks great also and adding the link to the upstream bug that caused this one was quite helpful. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxml-simple-ruby/+bug/296605 Adding the Debian watch for one of the bugs looks good. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libjson-ruby/+bug/161210 This looks good and can be made Invalid now since we have had no response from the original reporter and you were unable to recreate the bug. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libalgorithm-diff-ruby/+bug/305252 > -- Importance: Wishlist This looks good and I agree with an importance of wishlist and have set it. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnotify/+bug/205528 This looks fine. I actually ended up removing the package it was assigned to, since libnotify is not the same as the software they were requesting be packaged. The bug now has no package which isn't ideal but is the best spot for needs-packaging bugs at the moment. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgems-ruby/+bug/270619 The reporter seems to have indicated it was an issue with hardy-backports and looking at the dpkg output in the original description it we see 'ii rubygems 1.1.1-1~hardy1'. This is in fact from hardy-backports. Subsequently, the libgems-ruby Ubuntu task should become invalid and a hardy-backports project task opened. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby1.8/+bug/317313 This looks fine. Based on the quality of work I've seen I'm happy to approve your membership in the team. I'm sorry for the delay in approving you and welcome to the team! Sincerely, -- Brian Murray @ubuntu.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
