On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 07:42:38AM -0600, C de-Avillez wrote: > On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:04:35 -0600 > Draycen DeCator <[email protected]> wrote: > > > hggdh, > > > > Thanks for the response. Sorry about the URLs, I just noticed that on > > the wiki. I'm not sure how much information you want in regards to my > > process in deciding importance, so I've included just about > > everything you could need. Below is an explanation of how I decide > > the importance of bugs. (As a side note, I followed the wiki when I > > sent my application, so maybe add a step in there asking us to show > > examples of our procedures for deciding bug importance?) > > <snip/> > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/window-picker-applet/+bug/485352 > > (Low) This report is requesting a trivial feature be added to the > > Windows List Applet, and the desired function is clearly stated. > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/523236 > > (Low) The bug is simply a cosmetic issue, which does not affect > > functionality in any way. Also, while the translation is not correct, > > users are still able to tell what it is supposed to mean. > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/517777 > > (Low) Once again, this bug is a cosmetic issue that does not affect > > functionality. In the event that the background does happen to be > > black and render the text unreadable, the user can simply close > > nautilus and reopen the folder in order to resolve the issue. There > > is also a simple workaround. > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/515725 > > (Low) Another cosmetic bug that only minimally affects functionality. > > The user is also able to easily reset the zoom so the display is > > correct again. > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/516154 > > (Medium) I originally viewed this bug as Low due to the easy > > workaround of simply not using the "Ask me every time" feature. > > However, after some discussing in #ubuntu-bugs, it was suggested to > > me that this could potentially be seen as a security issue since it > > involves cookies. As a result, we determined that Medium was a better > > fit for this report. > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/514782 > > (Medium) This bug affects the functionality of a core application, so > > a moderate amount of people are likely to be affected. > > > > Hopefully this is a sufficient explanation of how I decide Importance. > > Agree on all. The reasoning also helped. > > <snip/> > > > > So -- please -- give us your view of how *you* would set the > > > importance. After reviewing them -- and I would expect you get them > > > very much correct --, I will be extremely happy in giving you a +1. > > > > > > Right now, thou... > > > > > > +0. # should be 1... > > Redaction: > > +1.
Reviewing the bugs you submitted as a part of your application I was really impressed by the bug descriptions and how they have been improved dramatically. Based on my and Carlos's review of your work I am happy to approve your membership in the team. Welcome! Sincerely, -- Brian Murray @ubuntu.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
