On 08/30/2010 11:45 PM, Mohammed Amine IL Idrissi wrote: > 1. Do you promise to be polite to bug reporters even if they are rude > to you or Ubuntu? Have you signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct? > I signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct, thus requiring me to be polite > and respectful to any person. > > 2. Have you read Bugs/HowToTriage, Bugs/Assignment, Bugs/Status and > Bugs/Importance? Do you have any questions about that documentation? > I read all of these pages, and understood them well without any > questions pending. > > 3. What sensitive data should you look for in a private Apport crash > report bug before making it public? See Bugs/HowToTriage for more > information. > I should look for login passwords, confidential photos... > I'm not sure I understood that question well, since only > ubuntu-bugcontrol has access to private bugs ; newcomers can't "test" > if they are capable of looking into private reports. But maybe I > didn't understand this question, so could you reformulate?
Also make sure that there is no coredump attached anymore and if yes check why. see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage#Apport%20crash%20reports > > 4. Is there a particular package or group of packages that you are > interested in helping out with? > Not really, I can triage everything without much trouble ; however, > I'm inclined toward handling desktop bugs. > > 5. Please list five or more bugs which you have triaged. These bugs > should demonstrate your understanding of the triage process and how to > properly handle bugs. If there is a bug in your list that does not > have an importance indicate what importance (and explain the > reasoning) you would give it after becoming a member of Ubuntu Bug > Control. Please use urls in your list of bugs. > * > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-input-evdev/+bug/503041 > : This was an old bug not assigned to any package ; howerver, I > confirmed it under Maverick, provided the required information via > apport-collect, and reported it upstream. > * https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vifm/+bug/615563 : > This bug was caused because Debian had modified the binary name > because of conflicts with another package, but forgot to update it in > one location. The patch supplied was forwarded to Debian, and a > debdiff was attached. (I realize I should had subscribed > ubuntu-sponsors, but I wasn't aware of this at the time. Sorry for > that) > * https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adduser/+bug/613204 > : Again, patch was forwarded to upstream (which is Debian in this > case). No response from upstream was heard until now. > * https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rox/+bug/615490 : > The attached patch was forwarded upstream, and accepted there. > * https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/387247: > Not much to say here. Good work in general, and considering your daily work in #ubuntu-bugs +1 from me. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
