On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:41:15 +0100 Jack Leigh <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Sent to myself and it worked fine so I really hope it will be > readable this time. > >> Would set importance according > >> to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WineTeam/Contributing, setting > >> upstreamed bugs to Triaged > > > > Actually, no, You are expected to set the importance according to > > *Ubuntu* rules [1]. Upstream's importance does not really play here > > (although, most of the times, Ubuntu and upstream do match). > Okay, sorry about that but was directed there by Wine team > documentation (which I guess should be sorted!). They seem to > accord more-or-less anyway. > > But, anyway, you did not indicate what importance you would have > > set on any of the bugs below. > > > >> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.2/+bug/607970 > > > > Thank you for upstreaming this bug. Good work (and I also frankly > > doubt if it will be resolved, but who knows). > I would mark this as Low since it affects a non-core application and > is an unusual request > > >> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.2/+bug/614546 > > > > Why did you mark it Fix Released for wine-1.2 (Ubuntu)? Have we > > already published the fix on Maverick? I do not think so, since the > > fix is on Wine 1.3.1. The actual stati should be: > > > > Fix Released for the upstream > > Triaged for the Ubuntu task. > > > > A bug is only considered Fix Released on Ubuntu when we publish the > > fixed version. > Okay, sorry about that -- got a bit confused because I assumed there > would be a wine1.3 package in Maverick like in the wine ppa. Bad > assumption! Thanks for fixing it up.Probably again Low since it > affects a minor application.Incidentally the Latin plural of > 'status' is 'statūs' (4th declension, masculine), so 'statuses' is > probably better! :D > >> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.2/+bug/479223 > >> -- added link to already filed upstream > > > > Thank you for the upstream link. > Would set this as Low since it's a rare/old application > >> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.2/+bug/601715 > > > > OK. What was triaged here? > Sorry, I think that might have been a mistake (although I have > requested further information and marked 'Incomplete')Have > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.2/+bug/624386 > instead, which I have confirmed and requested be upstreamed, then > provided further information on the upstream report and made the > upstream link.I would set the importance of this as Low since it is > a rare application that I'm not convinced is necessary/ever going to > work on Linux > >> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.2/+bug/502375 > >> -- duped a number of bugs which display the same symptoms to it, > >> requested more information about other sound-related bugs which > >> don't seem immediately linked to this > > > > Ugh! Sound bugs are nasty. It might be worth the time to check with > > the sound/pulseaudio experts. The only issue I have here is the > > fact that there are three different releases of Ubuntu (and > > two-ish of Wine) playing, not counting the sound stack. > Here I may set the importance to Medium since it has a much wider > impact.Should I just ask someone in #ubuntu-bugs regarding the sound > bugs (before duping?)? I was careful in leaving a number alone for > now.Upstream wine aren't very forgiving regarding pulseaudio and > wine is due to be moving to openAL so these are in flux a little at > the moment, I guess. > > All in all, a nice work, but needs more attention to the triaging > > documentation. I still want like to know what would you set as > > Importance on these bugs. > > > > Vote as of now is, then, > > > > 0. > > > > Cheers, > > Thanks for the feedback! Welcome :-) and sorry for the delay. Given your last responses, I do give you a +1. Now we should wait for other bug-controllers to pipe in and give their view (gentle prod, people!) Cheers, -- C de-Avillez IRC: hggdh This email (and any attachments) is digitally signed using GNUpg (http://gnupg.org). The public key is available at http://pgp.mit.edu. The key Id is 0xD3133E56.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
