On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 01:03:13PM -0500, C de-Avillez wrote: > On 05/18/2011 12:12 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > On Wed, 04 May 2011 16:06:38 -0500 > > C de-Avillez <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I am sorry -- are you a _maintainer_ or a _triager_ for LibreOffice? > >> Just curiosity, but if you are an upstream maintainer, you may be > >> entitled to a different process for joining BugControl. > > > > Maintainer. All LibreOffice uploads since February are by me. I will > > still keep my application up as this is faster that the maintainer > > membership process. > > > >> The explanations in the bugs are good to show your work as triager > >> (and maintainer, it seems); but what we ask for here is what > >> _importance_ you would set, and _why_. We do not ask for an > >> explanation of your work as triager. > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/775608 > > Importance: High in LibreOffice (Ubuntu) > > While the conditions to trigger the bug are not too common, Calc is a > > core application and installed by default and the results are possibly > > devastating because the error might go unnoticed for a long time at > > cause severe data corruption as a result. > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/754562 > > Importance: Medium in lo-menubar (Ubuntu Natty) > > lo-menubar is a non-core application and not installed by default. The > > scenario to trigger the bug is common, and the impact is severe with > > possible data-loss (by crashing LO with unsaved changes). > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/732412 > > Importance: Low in LibreOffice (Ubuntu) > > There is a known workaroud and it is mostly an cosmetic issue. Also the > > real bug is in bamf and the changes to LibreOffice are a workaround > > themselves. > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/740815 > > Importance: Undecided in LibreOffice (Ubuntu) > > Hard to tell how to judge that for a single package as the bug is not > > really affecting or effecting end users at all. As such the importance > > is only important judged by the additional maintainer work resulting > > from not fixing it. I would leave the importance deliberately > > "undecided" and leave the judgment to the Firefox maintainer. > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/746375 > > Importance: Medium-Low > > This is a bit of a cornercase. This is a crash, which should be > > considered at least "moderate impact", and LibreOffice is a core > > application making the importance "Medium". However, this is a rare > > issue, triggered by a race condition and the crash happens on exit > > without dataloss, thus this could be also considered a cosmetic issue > > => importance "Low". The reason I still cared about this bug is because > > a crash on exit can make automatic testing hard and thus create lots of > > needless work on packaging. > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/314147 > > Importance: Wishlist at LibreOffice (upstream) > > Requires new feature development upstream. > > > > Best, > > > > Bjoern > > > > Thank you, Bjoern. I agree with the reasoning; based on the work you > have done, I am more than happy to give you a > > +1. > > Now, we just need to wait a bit to give the others time to input.
This all looks great to me too. Welcome to the team! -- Brian Murray
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
