On 22/12/11 06:22, Mahyuddin Susanto wrote: > Hi, > I, Mahyuddin Susanto want to apply membership for Ubuntu Bug Control, > i have joined Ubuntu bugsqud for a year or so. > > __ Apllication __ > > 1. Do you promise to be polite to bug reporters even if they are rude > to you or Ubuntu? Have you signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct? > > I know that not all of the reporter signed the CoC and > sometimes some > of the complainant be harsh. I understand that they are frustrated > with the bug, for me it is the best opportunity to communicate about > their problems. With excellent communication I am sure they will > understand our position. > > Yes, I have signed the CoC and CoC I have great respect that I > have > signed. I am proud to sign it and did not want to complain revoke my > signature. > > 2. Have you read Bugs/HowToTriage, Bugs/Assignment, Bugs/Status and > Bugs/Importance? Do you have any questions about that documentation? > > Yes, i have read all of them and i have bookmarked all of them for > reference. > > 3. What sensitive data should you look for in a private Apport crash > report bug before making it public? See Bugs/HowToTriage for more > information. > > Password, bank/credit card mumber or other private data. Sometimes > some of reported declaring $PASSWORD in their ~/.bashrc. just like > mysql -u someuser -p$PASSWORD database
And coredumps... a coredump is a trove for private data. > > 4. Is there a particular package or group of packages that you are > interested in helping out with? > > I have interested in server related bug, security issue. Also i'm > interested to triagging some bug which produced from transition, for > example gold linker transitions which caused many packages failed to > build from strach. Or GCC 4.6 with w-error, perl transition, > python2, etc > > 5. Please list five or more bug reports which you have triaged and > include an explanation of your decisions. Please note that these bugs > should be representative of your very best work and they should > demonstrate your understanding of the triage process and how to > properly handle bugs. For all the bugs in the list, please indicate > what importance you would give it and explain the reasoning. Please > use urls in your list of bugs. > > * https://launchpad.net/bugs/717653 > This should be high because Buildd daemon cannot produce binary > packgae and effected to ubuntu users. This problem because of gold > linker, the library must be added into library (LDADD or LIBS) intead > of $LDFLAGS. I just create a patch to fixing the problem and submitted > into upstream and Debian. Good work and fix. But I have some restrictions here: (1) you reported the bug, you provided a patch, and you fixed it. What was the triage work done? (2) as a baseline, we usually do not like to see bugs you yourself reported and triaged. > > * https://launchpad.net/bugs/906792 > This is security bug, upstream has released patch to fixing it. It > must be medium because if we not solving this bug lighttpd still > running. Action: Inform debian maintainer about it Same comments as above. Additionally, Jamie asked you some questions that were never answered. > > * https://launchpad.net/bugs/831240, > https://launchpad.net/bugs/832862 > That was gcc4.6 problem, it must be high. Creating patch and > forwarded to Debian Ah, something that was opened by somebody else! > > * https://launchpad.net/bugs/749207, > https://launchpad.net/bugs/720725, https://launchpad.net/bugs/715735 > That was because of gold linker, creating patch and forwarded to > debian or upstream if exits same comments as on the first two bugs you linked. > > That's all, hopefully contain many information to join Ubuntu Bug > control > > Well. I *know* your work, so I am tainted. My problem is I see *NOTHING* showing triage knowledge. I see you understand compiling and linking (or, at least, linking ;-)). But we are trying to measure your knowledge of triaging for Ubuntu. And none of the bugs above show it, at least not completely -- you did assign the bug to yourself, showing you were working on them, but nothing more is visible... Although I wish to give you an OK here, you did not comply with the request: "(...) Please note that these bugs should be representative of your very best work and they should *demonstrate your understanding of the triage process and how to properly handle bugs* (...)" (italics mine). So, against my wish... +0. Cheers, ..C..
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
