Whoops, my message got trimmed. Can you find another bug as an example, because we prefer to see non-self-reported bug work.
------ Thomas On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Thomas Ward <[email protected]> wrote: > Alberto, > > Got another issue with the below, I've put in-line notes. > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear Thomas, >> >> About these two bugs that were not valid in my application for joining >> the Ubuntu BugControl team, I found two great substitutes: >> >> After selecting to view hidden and backup files, they aren't shown until >> the window is closed <https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/1161412> >> >> - I reported the bug myself, with rich detail. >> - I forwarded it upstream. >> >> - I would give it an importance of "low", since it's an usability issue >> that does not limit the functionality of the application. >> >> You shouldn't generally use self-reported bugs as examples. This is the > case with other applicants as well. > >> xSPIM application does not >> start<https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spim/+bug/824084> >> >> - I explained how this package dependencies where not correctly met. >> - I confirmed the bug was still there many releases after. >> - I tagged all the affected releases. >> - I reported the bug was still there and not as imagined by other user. >> - I added a work-around. >> - I would give it an importance of "high", since prevents the application >> from functioning at all and the work-around won't always on any Ubuntu >> release. >> >> Thanks for your care, >> Alberto >> >> >> El 10/04/13 18:30, Thomas Ward escribió: >> >> I should have rephrased. Forgive me. >> >> What I meant was do you have any examples of your own that you believe >> shows your ability to triage? The key point here is that two of the five >> bugs you posted weren't under Bug Control's purview. Do you have any other >> examples of bugs that are within Ubuntu which you've worked on, similar to >> the other three bugs you have already linked? They don't have to be the >> same, I'm looking for what you believe are good examples of your triage >> work on bugs within Bug Control's domain. >> >> (Also, remember to hit "Reply All", so that the Bug Control mailing >> list is also included in your responses.) >> >> ------ >> Thomas >> >> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Alberto Salvia Novella < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> El 08/04/13 18:44, Thomas Ward escribió: >>> >>> Hi there, Alberto! >>> >>> One of the things you'll need is patience, we're all busy working on >>> bugs and such in preparation for the release of Raring later this month. >>> >>> I have a couple of concerns of the bugs you've selected to display as >>> examples of your work. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> El 22/03/13 05:52, Alberto Salvia Novella escribió: >>>> >>>> Here is my application: >>>> >>>> 1. Do you promise to be polite to bug reporters even if they are rude >>>> to you or Ubuntu? Have you signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct? >>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, I promise: I signed Ubuntu Code of Conduct years ago, and read it >>>> recently. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2. Have you read >>>> Bugs/HowToTriage<https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage>, >>>> Bugs/Assignment <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Assignment>, >>>> Bugs/Status<https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status>and >>>> Bugs/Importance <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance>? Do you have >>>> any questions about that documentation? >>>> >>>> >>>> I have been an active member of Launchpad since 2007 and, since then, >>>> the only operating system I have used in my computers has been Ubuntu. In >>>> this period I read these wiki-pages many times, and from start to end >>>> before writing this application. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 3. What sensitive data should you look for in a private Apport crash >>>> report bug before making it public? See >>>> Bugs/HowToTriage<https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage>for more >>>> information. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> - I should look for "CoreDump.gz" and remove it if the stack trace >>>> provides enough details. >>>> >>>> - I should check into "Stacktrace.txt" and "ThreadStacktrace.txt" for >>>> any sensitive information like passwords, bank account numbers, CSS >>>> keys, user names or server names. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 4. Is there a particular package or group of packages that you are >>>> interested in helping out with? >>>> >>>> >>>> There isn't. My objective is Ubuntu to be perceived stable as a hole, >>>> by working on bugs that are more obvious and making them to be triaged as >>>> fast as possible. >>>> >>>> 5. Please list five or more bug reports which you have triaged and >>>> include an explanation of your decisions. Please note that these bugs >>>> should be representative of your very best work and they should demonstrate >>>> your understanding of the triage process and how to properly handle bugs. >>>> For *all* the bugs in the list, please indicate what importance you >>>> would give it *and* explain the reasoning. *Please use urls in your >>>> list of bugs.* >>>> >>>> Bandwidth limit is not correctly enforced: Transmission delays are >>>> inserted between data chunk writes (of arbitrary >>>> sizes)<https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntuone-storage-protocol/+bug/720707> >>>> - I change the hole bug description to be as clear as possible. Also >>>> the original one didn't have proper steps to reproduce it. >>>> - I deeply investigated the origin of the bug and how to workaround it. >>>> I provided the tools to test it by the users themselves. >>>> - I would give it an importance of "high", since it has a moderate >>>> impact on a large portion of Ubuntu users. >>>> >>>> This above bug here isn't in the Ubuntu project itself, and unless >>> I'm mistaken is outside the scope of bug control. >>> (ubuntuone-storage-protocol project is not the same as the Ubuntu project >>> and packages.) >>> >>>> >>>> Misinformation when intending to download the 64-bit >>>> edition<https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-website-content/+bug/585940> >>>> - I completely rewrote the hole bug, since it didn't reflect the scope >>>> of the hole long discussion hold. >>>> - I would give it an importance of "low", since it's usability issue >>>> that does not limit the functionality of Ubuntu but rather creates a >>>> probable non-ideal configurations scenario. >>>> >>>> >>> The above bug ALSO isn't in the Ubuntu project itself, and unless I'm >>> mistaken is outside the scope of bug control. (ubuntu-website-content >>> project is not the same as the Ubuntu project and packages.) >>> >>> >>>> Unable to upgrade >>>> "commercial/binary-i386/Packages"<https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1072705> >>>> - I change the hole bug description to be as clear as possible. >>>> - I asked the user to add the missing log files as separate >>>> attachments, in order to have them automatically available. Also marked the >>>> bug as incomplete. >>>> - Also asked to gather information using apport, since it was missed. >>>> - I would give it an importance of "low", since the program itself >>>> suggest the origin of the problem is a misconfiguration. >>>> >>>> upgrade issues >>>> 12.04=>12.10<https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1100189> >>>> - I transformed this but to a question, since the user made a >>>> cross-dependency issue himself by using an experimental ppa for xorg. So it >>>> wasn't a bug but a support request. >>>> - Since it is not longer a bug, its importance cannot be set. However >>>> is would give it an importance of "low", since it's hoped the user to be >>>> the only one affected. >>>> >>>> When selected partition is not focused, it becomes >>>> invisible<https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/1079196> >>>> - I attached an screen-cast which clearly showed the problem, but now I >>>> think screen-casts are useless when the bug description is clear. >>>> - I would give it an importance of "low", since it's an usability issue >>>> that does not limit the functionality of the application. >>>> - I assigned the bug to the "Paper Cuts Ninja" project, since of its >>>> low importance in a application provided in the default installation. >>>> >>>> Or have a look at any other bug from the bunch I have >>>> here<https://bugs.launchpad.net/%7Ees20490446e>, >>>> although they aren't the most impressive in the world. But happy birthday >>>> to me: I recently got my twenty-fives and also got at the same time my >>>> hundred bugs worked in. And if you notice any errata in this application >>>> there will be no problem in asking me to improve it. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Alberto Salvia Novella (es20490446e)<https://launchpad.net/%7Ees20490446e> >>>> >>>> >>>> El 08/01/13 15:10, C de-Avillez escribió: >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 00:36:30 Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: >>>> >>>> Please, accept me to join Ubuntu BugSquad and BugControl in Launchpad >>>> and I will show you what Raring is going to be. If you need more info >>>> about me and how familiar I am with the triaging process, you can have a >>>> look at my profile in Launchpad <https://launchpad.net/%7Ees20490446e> >>>> <https://launchpad.net/%7Ees20490446e>. >>>> >>>> My fault there regarding the Ubuntu-BugSquad. I have added you in (and >>>> processed all other pending requests). >>>> >>>> For Ubuntu BugControl the process is different. You must show you >>>> understand >>>> how we use status and importance, and you must show bugs you triaged. This >>>> process is explained in [1]. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> ..C.. >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugControl >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> So? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ubuntu-bugsquad mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugsquad >>>> >>>> >>> Do you have any other specific selections of bugs you would like to >>> showcase? >>> >>> (as well, bugsquad does not need to receive the application emails, so >>> please do not include the bugsquad mailing list in your "To" or "Cc" fields) >>> >>> ------ >>> Thomas >>> >>> How could I find bugs where I will be able to clearly demonstrate I'm >>> capable of managing them properly? >>> >> >> >> ------ > Thomas >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
