Did this go anywhere? Who resolves this? - c
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Thomas Ward <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Chad Miller <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Matthew Fischer > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> I'm generally +1 as well since I've also worked with Chad before, but > Chad > >> can you please list the severity you would assign the rest of those > issues > >> and why? > > > > > > Sure. > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/902747 > > Triaged/Low. Not enough memory to start up is also not enough memory to > > run. A nicer crash dialog is all we can hope for. Shoudn't affect many > > people. > > > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1226618 > > Incomplete/Undecided for now. On reply, either Invalid or Triaged/High > and > > tag "refression-update". Opening links from outside it is fundamental. > \> > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/1229065 > > On c-b, Triaged/Medium or Invalid. Big impact, noncore plugin. Maybe > > Invalid for c-b when we have more information. > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1225215 > > Triaged/High. Medium impact on many users. > > I'm disagreeing with your assessment here on this bug. Ignoring the > fact that this bug was filed by you, Chad, the reason for my > disagreeing is because this bug is missing key information that > myself, as a triager, would want to see in order to confirm the bug. > Specifically, the version of Ubuntu affected and the version of > Chromium affected. Without those two bits of information, triagers > would need to test every currently-supported version of Ubuntu and > chromium-browser to narrow down which versions of Ubuntu are affected, > and not every triager has every version of Ubuntu at their beck and > call. > > And I am making a point of this, because, under the LTS (12.04) I run > CPU intense programs routinely, and even when all available CPU power > is pumped into things, and I start chromium-browser, I cannot > replicate this bug. Sure, it loads a bit slower because all the CPU > power is being utilized for other things, but I can't specifically > replicate this bug. Version details are missing, and that's all that > I'd need to see to be able to continue to test/triage that bug, or at > the very least confirm the bug exists. (I would probably set this as > Incomplete/Undecided until that information was provided, especially > since I can't replicate this on 12.04 so there may be a > version-specific issue here.) > > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/1228417 > > On a-f, New/Undecided. probably High. Segv 5 frames deep in proprietary > > code. > > > >-------------------- > > Other than the issues with that 4th bug, I don't see any other issues > with your assessment on those other bugs. +1 from me, based on the > other 4 bugs. > > ------ > Thomas Ward > https://launchpad.net/~teward >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
