On 2014-07-19 00:53, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > In the triage guide (http://tinyurl.com/kz4netu) there's a list for > suggested bugs for being triaged, which basically is one of reports > being untouched and not confirmed. > > Although confirming bugs could be taken into consideration, for triaging > wouldn't it be better to suggest confirmed bugs instead?
Considering that a bug gets "confirmed" as soon as somebody besides the bug reporter states that it affects him/her, I think that confirmed bugs should always be included when looking for untouched bugs. Guess that page ought to be edited. > Also it seems to me that shorting bugs with higher heat rather than with > higher importance could be a good idea for triaging, If importance has been set, the bug has already been triaged, hasn't it? But indeed the bug heat can serve as an importance indicator of untriaged bug reports. -- Gunnar Hjalmarsson https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
