On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:50:20 -0400 Bryan Quigley <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Bug Control, > > I've been an Ubuntu member since 2006 and have been triaging bugs for > a lot of that time. I now work for Canonical in Support and we just > got Bug Control access (thanks!) but I wanted to get approved > personally too. Great! > > 1.Do you promise to be polite to bug reporters even if they are rude > to you or Ubuntu? > Yes. > Have you signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct? > Yup. https://launchpad.net/~bryanquigley/+codesofconduct > > 2. Have you read Bugs/Triage, Bugs/Assignment, Bugs/Status and > Bugs/Importance? Do you have any questions about that documentation? > Yes. Now that with brainstorm gone what's the best way to suggest a > feature? Just propose a UDS session? (that's generally what I've > done) > > 3. What sensitive data should you look for in a private Apport crash > report bug before making it public? See Bugs/Triage for more > information. > Coredump file and possible data leaking in functions in the > stacktrace. How thorough is a judgement call given how sensitive the > crashing application is. Absolutely correct; for a while I was working on a stacktrace sanitiser, but never completed it... > > 4. Is there a particular package or group of packages that you are > interested in helping out with? > LibreOffice has mostly been my triage focus so far, but I do a much > bigger range for work. I also maintain gnome-nibbles upstream. I'd > also like to help triage top crashers from errors.ubuntu.com so that > they don't stay private for long. > > 5. Please list five or more bug reports which you have triaged and > include an explanation of your decisions. > > Forwarded upstream because it had enough to be worked on. Medium seems > fine as it shouldn't impact the average sudoku player. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-sudoku/+bug/1272716 OK. > > Medium is fine for this bug as well, balancing that it is a hard crash > but difficult to reproduce. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1350369 Given it has been confirmed upstream, we should make the Ubuntu task triaged. Otherwise (even being your own bug), good work. (I did make it triaged). > > Low would be good for this bug because it's only if you manually > remove part of libreoffice. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1359304 So, what will happen now here? You have confirmed the bug on Trusty, but did not keep on with it. Otherwise good. > > I would have marked this as High as it could cause a machine to lose > the network interface user expects to be able to reach it on. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/saucy/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1160490 Good work. This bug also happens to be a good example of a fix introducing a regression. > > This can stay at low only because it has an easy workaround. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/dbus/+bug/592434 All in all: +1. Cheers, ..C.. -- ab alio expectes alteri quod feceris
pgpHPfGL10Fka.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
