I'm now including importance as I would assign them with reasoning. First, a continued discussion of my question:
>> In the even of a failure in debian-installer, for >> example, the apport tools are not available and being that it is not >> necessarily a crash, it makes it hard to report. What files should we >> request? In other words, I couldn't find any info about how apport works anywhere. Seems trivial to collect info. Lots of automated tools depend on these files being there. Seems like a good improvement for a Wiki page. > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1380774 I would mark this high. It already is, but it's clearly something that severely affects a small portion (Lubuntu alternate and Ubuntu server) of users. > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1363180 Normally, I would mark this as high since it severely affects a small portion (ppc) of users. However, since ppc is community supported, I'd mark it medium. One could even argue low due to unusual hardware but Lubuntu still actively has a ppc release, so I'd be disinclined to say that. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxsession/+bug/1376380 I'd call this medium. It's an interesting blend of a bug that has very severe consequences but requires a rather unique set of problems to manifest itself. Alberto said: > You forgot to add the bug-watch to the panel! Not true. You can't: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1359030 > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/obconf/+bug/1272834 Low. Easy workaround. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shared-mime-info/+bug/1216788 Low. Non-core and a minor aesthetic problem. Thanks everyone. wxl
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
