+1 from me. On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Zoltán Balogh <[email protected] > wrote:
> > On 17/11/14 23:05, C de-Avillez wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Zoltán Balogh >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> 1. a brief reasoning of why it is important for the team to be a member. >>> >>> I would like to migrate the bug control of the UITK from the >>> lp:ubuntu-ui-toolkit to the ubuntu-ui-toolkit package. Right now >>> everybody >>> from my team can evaluate new bugs, respond to them and assign them to >>> the >>> right engineer in the team. I would like to keep the error handling >>> process >>> the same. >>> >>> 2. a list of Ubuntu source packages which the team plans to work on. >>> >>> ubuntu-ui-toolkit, qtcreator-plugin-ubuntu >>> >>> 3. identify who is/are the representative(s) -- give us the link to >>> the >>> Launchpad page of each one. >>> >>> https://launchpad.net/~zeller-benjamin >>> https://launchpad.net/~kalikiana >>> https://launchpad.net/~fboucault >>> https://launchpad.net/~tpeeters >>> https://launchpad.net/~zsombi >>> https://launchpad.net/~bzoltan >>> https://launchpad.net/~timo-jyrinki >>> >> Actually, only you and Timo can be representatives (you are the only >> two with BugControl membership). >> >> Requirements for Teams >>> >>> 1. The team must be a closed or moderated one. >>> >>> All of the team members are reporting to me and work for Canonical. >>> >> But you did not give us the team name on LP. It is the team that will >> be granted membership, not the individuals (which means that if the >> move to a different team, they lose BC access). >> >> I am assuming this is a closed/moderated team (which was the question). >> > > This is the whole team -> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu- > sdk-team/+members#active > > It is a closed and moderated team with only Canonical employed members. > All of the members are active developers of the SDK and UITK > > >> 2. The team must require its members to sign the Ubuntu Code of Conduct >>> >>> Done >>> >>> 3. The team must have at least one representative tasked with >>> educating new >>> members on Ubuntu Bug Control policies. >>> >>> I can do that, but all the team members are expert bug handlers >>> >> I do not doubt, but I would still like to point out that your upstream >> projects (or even internal Canonical ones) may have slightly different >> rules for bug triaging than on Ubuntu. >> > > I understand that. I am sure that with Timo on board we are in good hands. > > > >> 4. The representative above must be a current member, directly or >>> indirectly, of Ubuntu Bug Control. >>> >>> That is me. >>> >> And/or Timo. >> >> 5. The team must limit their use of Ubuntu Bug Control permissions to a >>> specific set of packages. (They should not be setting the importance of >>> bugs >>> about every package in Ubuntu.) >>> >>> Only two packages, as listed above >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >> Please give us the team home page on LP. Apart from that, I am OK with >> the request. >> >> Cheers, >> >> ..C.. >> > > > Thanks > > bzoltan > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
