I was tired when I sent those messages, please disregard them. However, +1 from me in any case.
Thomas On 08/13/2015 11:50 AM, Brian Murray wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 05:27:00PM +0200, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: >> Mathew Hodson: >>> I think it is the SRU team that ultimately decides. >> >> I found that usually only developers themselves can tell if a bug is >> good for a stable release update or not. The rest just make an >> assumption. > > I think we've lost some of the context with the question and Mathew's > answer. > > Thomas's question follows: > > "So, one question from me on this: What if it is marked as SRU, but > the bug doesn't qualify, or the fixes don't work, or one of the edge cas > es where it is poorly prepared?" > > Then Mathew's response: > > "If I thought the change was too high risk or not severe enough to > justify a SRU, I would probably leave a note, but I wouldn't change the > status, because I think it is the SRU team that ultimately decides." > > I'd interpret Thomas's question as meaning the bug task already has an > upload in either -proposed, or the unapproved queue for -proposed, or > perhaps a debdiff for a stable release attached to it. Regardless, once > the bug task has a fix prepared it really is the Stable Release Updates > team that makes a decision about letting the new package version into > -proposed. > > I believe this is captured in Step 6 of the procedure at > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/#Procedure. > > -- > Brian Murray > Ubuntu Bug Master > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
