Le 2015-10-01 13:48, Alberto Salvia Novella a écrit : > Alan Pope: >> Yes, I've used that feature a lot. You've missed the point where I >> said the upstream isn't on launchpad. It's here on github. > > You can both configure the project to be upstream itself, or to point to > a upstream bug tracker. > > Note the difference: > <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1501782/+choose-affected-product> > > <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1501289/+choose-affected-product>
Those are not the same at all -- please don't confuse them. It's correct for unity to have a bugtracker on Launchpad, as it is a project from Ubuntu developers, who consciously chose LP to be the official point of contact for the project. This *isn't* the case for Xorg. > > Thomas Ward: >> We on bugcontrol should never have to mess with Launchpad >> projects, nor would we necessarily have to create projects just to >> link remote bugtrackers > > We should, as this saves us for looking for the bug tracker each time we > have to upstream. This is specially important when you are working with > all the 48000+ packages in Ubuntu. > No, it's not. You don't need the bugtrackers on projects, you can link to upstream bug reports, in their own bug trackers, using the proper URLs. This ensures the upstream developers get the bug reports, and that we know when an upstream bug is fixed, so we know there may be a patch to cherry-pick. > > Thomas Ward: >> If we did that for everything we'd have one project for every package. > > Not really, as many packages belong to the same upstream project. And > even if that was the case, it would still be more convenient than > looking for the upstream bug tracker for every package you triage. > It's irrelevant really. You *do* need to look for the upstream bug tracker if there is one, for any package you triage. It is important to try to get the patches and changes back upstream, or to let upstream developers know of the bugs so they can work on them. It's also *critical* that we don't force upstream developers to go look in multiple places to find the bugs relevant to their project, as this would be confusing and a big waste of time. In other words, if something isn't specifically *your* project, or very explicitly meant to be hosted on Launchpad, it doesn't need a bugtracker configured for the project on Launchpad -- nothing needs to change. -- Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <[email protected]> Freenode: cyphermox, Jabber: [email protected] 4096R/DC95CA5A 36E2 CF22 B077 FEFE 725C 80D3 C7DA A946 DC95 CA5A
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
