Hello Alberto. Thanks for your feedback which helps me to see some practices from a different perspective.
I see your point on all of the things you wrote (and am working on fixing them where possible) but want to give a comment on a few points: Alberto Salvia Novella: > ---------------------- > 🔇 SILENCE IS GOLDER > ---------------------- > > Jonas Diekmann: > > (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1657440) > > -- Asked on #ubuntu-bugs to triage this. > > This is a common practise, but I recommend not doing it. People shall > communicate only when there's an abnormality, not when doing ordinary work. > Otherwise you end getting a big wave of irrelevant messages. > > (https://eriskusnadi.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/push-pull-system.png) > > The moment a bug is confirmed it automatically appears in my work-flow as > requiring importance to be set, so noticing me about that really does nothing: > > (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/One%20Hundred%20Papercuts/Importance/Lists%20of%20bugs) I totally understand this and will stop doing so from now on. Maybe you want to remove the following sentences from the box in the documentation under https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Bug%20statuses. Thats were I got this idea from. "Paste the report number in #ubuntu-bugs channel at FreeNode and say you think the report should be set to 'Triaged' with importance 'Wishlist / Low / Medium / High / Critical' according to Bugs/Importance. Someone will notice your comment and set it for you, although not necessarily immediately." > > > ------------- > 💟 PAPERCUT > ------------- > > Jonas Diekmann: > > (https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1657092) > > (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Triage): > > If the bug is trivial to fix, is it marked as affecting the > > "hundredpapercuts" project? Does this even apply if the bug has a patch attached to it (as was the case here)? > > > ------------------ > 📤 STABLE UPDATE > ------------------ > > Jonas Diekmann: > > (https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1657092) > > (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/One%20Hundred%20Papercuts/Triage/Classify%20as%20a%20stable%20release%20update): > > If a bug falls into one of these cases: > > ... > > - Fixing it has little chance of messing other things up > > ... > > You shall nominate it for a stable release update. That is new to me. So I should not work on getting this into the upstream project first, so Ubuntu can release upstream packages instead of deriving its own ones? Best Regards Vej _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
