This wording is also personally offensive to me. You guys know full well that Canonical doesn't maintain everything in Main, so why say something like that? What are you trying to say to users here? "Canonical- supported" is bearable, even if stretching a bit. If you read the definition of "main" on http://www.ubuntu.com/community/ubuntustory/components you will see "Canonical" nowhere, so why is it being used?
-- "Canonical-maintained" tooltip is misleading about Canonical support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263689 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
