An EULA is just unacceptable. This is not hate or anger; just common sense. Installing Ubuntu then suddenly becomes "the lawyers have to look at some EULA" ..
Not acceptable by default. Firefox can be offered in add/remove or as a link, or even a sort of wizard; but we can't have the risk of people clicking through EULA's in the name of their company. We can't also, everywhere, make sure we can legally accept the EULA. I don't really understand what Mozilla is doing... - this is making it difficult to preinstall firefox - this is making installing Ubuntu a lawyer related question At least offer an EULA-free Ubuntu-spin. EULA's are legally speaking much much more difficult to work with than (and this is ironic!) closed- source software. -- AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
