Scott Kitterman wrote: > I just read http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080917045510597 > and I see Canonical/Ubuntu as being characterized as being on the wrong > side of this issue and I have to agree. The one avoidable mistake that > I think was made was to ship the version that required the click- > through. We could have done as Fedora did an stay with an earlier > version until this was resovled. > No, Scott, we absolutely could not ship what Fedora shipped, and I hope you will trust me that that is the case. We also would not have this current conversation if we had not chosen to ship what was requested, immediately.
Mark -- AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
