Mark Shuttleworth wrote: "There is no doubt in my mind that the right thing to do is leave the anti-phishing service on, and leave Firefox in main."
Do you believe that it is acceptable to have application software in main that you are not free to modify and distribute? Doesn't this contradict the Ubuntu "main" Component license Policy( http://www.ubuntu.com/community/ubuntustory/licensing )? All application software included in the Ubuntu main component: *Must include source code. The main component has a strict and non-negotiable requirement that application software included in it must come with full source code. *Must allow modification and distribution of modified copies under the same license. Just having the source code does not convey the same freedom as having the right to change it. Without the ability to modify software, the Ubuntu community cannot support software, fix bugs, translate it, or improve it. -- AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
