-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 pakraticus wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 02:52:34PM -0000, James Westby wrote: >> I believe this is incorrect, adding a file to /etc/pm/config.d/ will >> allow them to use it. > > Which could be supplied by uswsusp. Which could then be managed > through debconf for uswsusp. > And then there would be grounds to have a uswsusp-s2ram package > that should probably nag and complain that the user really should open > a bug against pm-utils if they must use the package. > That would be a bad idea. If we want uswsusp to work with pm-utils by default (if uswsusp is installed) then no changes need to be done. But what James Westby and the rest of them want to do is allow uswsusp to be installed, and pm-utils doesn't use it unless you explicitly install AND enable it. Well this effect could be achieved better through the use of debconf, but honestly, too many prompts by debconf isn't pretty, and should be kept to a minimum.
And also, I agree that if we don't have s2ram even built in the uswsusp package, then we should at least have a separate package with just s2ram in it. - -- Hyperair -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFI3SXM4LFcUo8CpBERAq16AJ43lYsGF1waxMC9d9e9lm+A7QACTwCfSkQF ifKMGBWXbAy4tSeLE1gSyT8= =dcix -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to 1.1.2.4-1ubuntu2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267141 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
