A few months ago I asked MSI about the diffrence between 1.xx and 3.xx and got this response: " Bios V3.XX is for windows XP.Bios V1.xx is for windows Vista.The differences between these two version BIOS are not only AHCI,but also SLP(system lock preinstallation,and others.So I advise you to use the right BIOS version. "
I really didn't understand what SLP is and what 'others' mean, but I guess that if somone wants to use SATA, then 1.xx is the safer way (but that doesn't belong to this bug). About SLP - does anyone here know what that means ? or is it related to this ? Thanks, Idan. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:29 AM, matejcik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i didn't do any deeper research, i just assumed that XP version would be > "more compatible". and from what i've seen now, the SATA support seems to be > the same. > I also liked the mixed switch on friend's PR200 White variant, that was one > of the reasons for upgrading ;e) not that i care too much about this > feature, it just seemed interesting, i might get tired of it. > (main reason was broken PXE booting in our company, i tried to update the > BIOS hoping that it would fix the PXE boot (and it didn't)) > i can certainly try it, but if the only difference is default setting for > AHCI mode and BT/WLAN switch, then why do they differentiate? > > -- > Kernel detects battery management wrong (MSI PR200 / System76) > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147560 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- Kernel detects battery management wrong (MSI PR200 / System76) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs