How on earth is bluez-gnome not an option? I can't fathom why something (a bluetooth GUI!) many people have used for all of the recent releases should be stripped out completely if there's a perfectly fine solution available. Now if there's a serious *functional* problem when using bluez-gnome, that's a different story!
But it appears to be just a "vanity" issue, does it not? In that case I would strongly suggest going with bluez-gnome until there's a working KDE counterpart available. It's not like this would be the first transitional package of all times.. Of course I completely agree with Christian's last 3 sentences. We should never have been in this situation in the first place. But we are now and simply looking the other way won't help. Bottom line is this: not having a bluetooth GUI of some sort is a *defect* for many users. Using one of a different desktop environment most likely wouldn't even be noticed.. As a last thought: if the concern is that a gnome component would require too many libs that take away hard drive space, then how about popping up a window saying "hey, HAL has detected a bluetooth adapter. would you like to install bluez-gnome, requiring X mb on your hard drive?" -- solid-bluetooth needs update for bluez 4.x https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280997 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebase-workspace in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
