On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 14:53 +0000, japi wrote: > Okay, sorry for that, i meant SLEEP_MODULE="uswsusp". > Just to be sure i have used SLEEP_MODULE and SUSPEND_MODULE for the following > tests :-) : > > Here is my logfile for SLEEP_MODULE="kernel": > http://www.ziqu.de/launchpad/pm-suspend.log_kernel.txt > > and here for SLEEP_MODULE="uswsusp": > http://www.ziqu.de/launchpad/pm-suspend.log_uswsusp.txt > > (also attached here as tarfile) > > ** Attachment added: "logfiles_pm-suspend.tar" > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19511716/logfiles_pm-suspend.tar > Out of curiosity, what's in /etc/pm/sleep.d/config? Not that it'll change anything, since it's not working, as shown by the lines in pm-suspend.log
Also, sorry, I meant SLEEP_MODULE. You can remove the SUSPEND_MODULE line. It seems that the tty is switched to TTY1 in the case of uswsusp, but not in the case of kernel. Could you test if running pm-suspend --quirk-vbe-post from TTY1 works? With SLEEP_MODULE="kernel" I mean. Thanks for your help. -- Chow Loong Jin -- backlight failed after suspend to ram on IBM X40 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292256 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs