I did a little benchmarking regarding the graphics performance in Sidux
Ourea (released 22 Sep) and Ubuntu Intrepid, both amd64 version. The
results are in the attached tarball, and they are fairly interesting!

The hardware is a Lenovo Thinkpad R61i with an integrated Intel GM965
GPU.

I compared the log-files from both OS-es.
The several Xorg driver and module versions, reported by Xorg.0.log are the 
same. EXA is used in both cases.
Looking at glxinfo results, the main differences are in Mesa OpenGL Renderer 
and OpenGL version strings, and GLX extensions.
In neither cases does does xorg.conf contain any special device options, so it 
is not included in the tarball.

glxgears and OpenArena timedemo "anholt"
(http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/Benchmarking) showed remarkable
differences though. The performance under Sidux (exa!) is approximately
that of Gutsy with XAA and early-Hardy!!! (I also noticed the huge
performance drop after 8.04.1). The Interpid results are as poor as
already mentioned in this thread.

I am not an expert. Can anyone tell the cause of these differences?



** Attachment added: "Log files and benchmark results, Ubuntu 8.10 vs. Sidux 
2008-03"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19513257/results.tar.gz

-- 
Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 
8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to