On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Rolf Leggewie <launchpad.net@ rolf.leggewie.biz> wrote:
> Thomas M. Hinkle wrote: > > Ah. What's an SRU exception? > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributedDevelopment/Requirements/SRU > Oddly, that page doesn't actually define "SRU" :) I'm guessing that's "stable release update". > > > Would it be simple to set up a repository for Gourmet users that we > > could more frequently update for them? > > While that could be done, I'm not sure it would be desirable. I'd like > to stick with the official distributions as much as possible. There is > a reason that an SRU is not an easy thing. > Well... right, but gourmet 0.14.x is not a stable branch. In this case, users and the project are better served by frequent updates, I'd think. > Can the problem be patched out of 0.14.0? A patched version should go > through more easily. > Sure -- I think in this case the difference between a "patched version" and "version 0.14.2" is just semantics. I call it a "version" every time I release a new package -- that doesn't tell you much about how much code has changed. Tom > > -- > Upgrading from 0.13.x to 0.14.0 wipes out ingredient database > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291353 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- Upgrading from 0.13.x to 0.14.0 wipes out ingredient database https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291353 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
