On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 06:01:59PM -0000, Pander wrote: > License is multiple times in the .js source code, see > > ~/.mozilla/firefox/qh2aiwql.default/extensions/[EMAIL PROTECTED] grep -riI > mit *|grep -i license > chrome/content/shared/passwordmeter.js:License: MIT License (see below) > chrome/content/shared/passwordmeter.js:Modified: 20060620 - added MIT License > chrome/content/foxmarks-utils.js: License: > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php > chrome/content/foxmarks-utils.js: * Released under the MIT license
Folks should really put a license file in the .xpi ... otherwise we need to review each individual file and if there is any that doesnt have an explicit license hint, its not sure. We probably can remove preference .js files and install.rdf as well as chrome.manifest from the list of files that require an explicit copyright, but most authors forget license headers in .xul/xml files. - Alexander -- [needs-packaging] Foxmarks (Firefox extension) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
