Charles, doing a new upstream microrelease with important cherrypicks sounds excellent in general, and might also benefit other people/distros that way. In general I'm not so much concerned whether something is called 1.34+patches or 1.35, but rather whether the changes have a considerable potential to cause regressions. In general, 10 known bugs are better than introducing one new one. OTOH, with hardy being an LTS, backporting safe patches is a real benefit for users, and thus will be widely appreciated.
So we should make sure to have a good QA cycle on that, but otherwise I'm fine with this. Thank you! -- multiple download works strangely https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295040 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
