On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:34:47AM -0000, John Vivirito wrote: > On 12/08/2008 02:50 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > > we should rather rename them upstream. I never understood why folks add > > a prefix even though most work on multiple mozilla xul applications > > anyway. > > > That would just make that much more work since we have already packaged > them. changing depends it more work than its worth since we have most if > not all packaged (either in archives or ready or being worked on. If one > of them are not any of the above 1 or 2 we can package. I dont like the > idea of fixing each package since we have them. >
You are right. Just would like to recall that in case we dont have it packaged we should try to convince upstream (as in debian) to drop this stupid name prefix. If that doesnt work out: maintain on our own and remove the iceweasel stuff. - Alexander -- [Jaunty] Please remove all iceweasel packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306229 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
