Sancho Panza wrote: > Thanks Tom, for all your effort in pushing this. I did run the test (without > any of > the patches you listed in earlier posts) and my output is: > > Testing repeat mode none: PASS > Testing repeat mode normal: PASS > Testing repeat mode pad: PASS > Testing repeat mode reflect: *** FAIL *** > 60 pixels differ from expected result. > Expected output written to repeat-test-reflect-expected.png > Actual output written to repeat-test-reflect-out.png > > I have an Intel integrated graphics card. I dont remember the command I could > use to > get more details about the card,
You can figure out what card you have using the command below. Is this hardy, intrepid or jaunty? lspci | grep Display > else would have given more specifics. Should I go > ahead and install the patched xulrunner and rerun the tests? The tests use XRender directly, so they won't be affected by installing those packages. > Tom, regarding the patch, you mentioned that applying it be slower and > performance could take a hit. > I scale up almost all the webpages I browse, so does that mean it > would add up to a notable performance hit? There'll be a noticable performance degradation if you only install the xulrunner package. If you also install the cairo package, you should be fine. You'll probably have to pull in a few dependencies from jaunty to be able to use the package on intrepid (I can't put intrepid packages in my PPA, unfortunately). -- Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
