Andy Whitcroft wrote: > That is unexpected as the headers are generated from the same source as > the kernel in theory, and both should have been built from the same > version of utsrelease.h and thus have the same value. > > Checking the flavour specific headers those are (as expected) flavour > specific headers. They appear to have the correct version of the header > file matching the version number: > > ==> > ./headers-amd64/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.27-10-server/include/linux/utsrelease.h > <== > #define UTS_RELEASE "2.6.27-10-server" > > ==> > ./headers-i386/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.27-10-server/include/linux/utsrelease.h > <== > #define UTS_RELEASE "2.6.27-10-server" > > I would therefore expect this to have been correct without manual > intervention. Can we confirm that your installed header package is > identicle to the one I have. You can find the installed package file in > /var/cache/apt, something like this: > > md5sum /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-2.6.27-10-server_*.deb > > I am expecting the following: > > a...@dm$ sum -r linux-headers-2.6.27-10* > 47256 630 linux-headers-2.6.27-10-server_2.6.27-10.20_amd64.deb > 00922 614 linux-headers-2.6.27-10-server_2.6.27-10.20_i386.deb > a...@dm$ > > Also could you have a look at the installation logs from apt for when it > installed the package and see what if anything it said. These are in > /var/log/apt/term.log and its predecessors, searching for the package > name should find it. > > ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) > Assignee: (unassigned) => Andy Whitcroft (apw) > Status: Triaged => In Progress > > ** Summary changed: > > - utsrelease.h states that version is 2.6.27-7 > + utsrelease.h states that version is 2.6.27-7 following install of > 2.6.27-10-server > > ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) > Status: In Progress => Incomplete > > Well, I don't have the 2.6.27-10 headers package in /var/cache/apt/archives:
r...@jmitchel-desktop:/home/jmitchel# md5sum /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-2.6.27-10* md5sum: /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-2.6.27-10*: No such file or directory And here's the log where they were replaced: Selecting previously deselected package linux-headers-2.6.27-11-server. Unpacking linux-headers-2.6.27-11-server (from .../linux-headers-2.6.27-11-server_2.6.27-11.22_i 386.deb) ... Preparing to replace linux-headers-generic 2.6.27.10.13 (using .../linux-headers-generic_2.6.27. 11.14_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement linux-headers-generic ... Preparing to replace linux-headers-server 2.6.27.10.13 (using .../linux-headers-server_2.6.27.11 .14_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement linux-headers-server ... And there's no other mention of 2.6.27-10 r...@jmitchel-desktop:/var/log/apt# gzcat term.*.gz | grep linux-headers-server Preparing to replace linux-headers-server 2.6.22.15.22 (using .../linux-headers-server_2.6.24.22.24_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement linux-headers-server ... Preparing to replace linux-headers-server 2.6.27.10.13 (using .../linux-headers-server_2.6.27.11.14_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement linux-headers-server ... Setting up linux-headers-server (2.6.27.11.14) ... Here's the dates on the directories in /usr/src: r...@jmitchel-desktop:/usr/src# ls -alt | more total 547724 drwxrwsr-x 28 root src 4096 2009-01-18 19:47 . drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 2009-01-18 19:47 linux-headers-2.6.27-11-server drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 2009-01-18 19:47 linux-headers-2.6.27-11-generic drwxr-xr-x 22 root root 4096 2009-01-18 19:47 linux-headers-2.6.27-11 drwxr-xr-x 26 root root 4096 2009-01-16 00:21 linux-source-2.6.27 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root src 19 2009-01-15 23:31 linux -> linux-source-2.6.27 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 52018876 2009-01-15 07:30 linux-source-2.6.27.tar.bz2 drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 2008-12-21 06:18 linux-headers-2.6.27-10-server drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2008-12-08 17:25 nvidia-173.14.12 drwxr-xr-x 14 root root 4096 2008-12-06 06:34 .. drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 2008-12-06 06:34 linux-headers-2.6.27-10-generic drwxr-xr-x 22 root root 4096 2008-12-06 06:33 linux-headers-2.6.27-10 md5sum: /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-2.6.27-10*: No such file or directory r...@jmitchel-desktop:/var/lib/dpkg/info# apt-get --reinstall install linux-headers-2.6.27-10-server Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 628kB of archives. After this operation, 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com intrepid-proposed/main linux-headers-2.6.27-10-server 2.6.27-10.20 [628kB] Fetched 628kB in 1s (616kB/s) (Reading database ... 284890 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace linux-headers-2.6.27-10-server 2.6.27-10.20 (using .../linux-headers-2.6.27-10-server_2.6.27-10.20_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement linux-headers-2.6.27-10-server ... Setting up linux-headers-2.6.27-10-server (2.6.27-10.20) ... Examining /etc/kernel/header_postinst.d. run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/header_postinst.d/dkms * Running DKMS auto installation service for kernel 2.6.27-10-server * nvidia (173.14.12)... nvidia (173.14.12): Already installed on this kernel. [ OK ] run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/header_postinst.d/nvidia-common And now: r...@jmitchel-desktop:/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.27-10-server/include/linux# more utsrelease.h #define UTS_RELEASE "2.6.27-10-server" So I guess it was caused by something else that I ran and forgot about. Sorry for the wild goose chase. Jason M. -- utsrelease.h states that version is 2.6.27-7 following install of 2.6.27-10-server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318097 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
