hm... what exactly will this do? for min12xxw, there's hardly ever a bug filed against it (but iirc a few were filed against cups instead - which admitted was the right place since only cups could workaround the real problem which is a faulty hardware implementation of the usb printing protocol). If I add this hook to min12xxw, will this help to get bugs referring to min12xxw based printers to hit the min12xxw package instead of cups? If not, I doubt it's worth it for this case, due to the extremely low bug ratio for min12xxw (and debian's popcon stats indicate that min12xxw based printers aren't really that much widespread so I don't expect much bug reports in the future).
-- bug reports would benefit from an apport hook https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338442 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs