hm... what exactly will this do? for min12xxw, there's hardly ever a bug filed 
against it (but iirc a few were filed against cups instead - which admitted was 
the right place since only cups could workaround the real problem which is a 
faulty hardware implementation of the usb printing protocol). 
If I add this hook to min12xxw, will this help to get bugs referring to 
min12xxw based printers to hit the min12xxw package instead of cups? If not, I 
doubt it's worth it for this case, due to the extremely low bug ratio for 
min12xxw (and debian's popcon stats indicate that min12xxw based printers 
aren't really that much widespread so I don't expect much bug reports in the 
future).

-- 
bug reports would benefit from an apport hook
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338442
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to