vj wrote:
> I can't believe that this problem still exists after two years. If
> theres one thing worse than no backups, it's faulty backups. A backup
> program that does not verify the backup and doesn't even report failures
> is useless - this is really a bug.
>
> Is there some way that this can be converted to a bug report or have the
> priority increased?
Current development is focused on nssbackup ('Not so Simple Backup'),
which actually does test integrity of backups, and reports problems.
nssbackup is still in alpha state, however, and we're working on merging
in sbackup (or its features) into it.
Please have a look at https://launchpad.net/nssbackup if you're
interested.
--
Groetjes,
Anton
_____________ _______________________________________________________
| | |
| _ _ ___,| K. Anton Feenstra |
| / \ / \'| | | IBIVU/Bioinformatics - Free University Amsterdam |
|( | )| | | De Boelelaan 1083A - 1081 HV Amsterdam - Netherlands |
| \_/ \_/ | | | Tel +31 20 59 87783 - Fax +31 20 59 87653 - Room P136 |
| | feens...@few.vu.nl - www.few.vu.nl/~feenstra/ |
| | "Yeah, uh uh, Neil's Head !" (Neil) |
|_____________|_______________________________________________________|
--
Sbackup should report when a backup fails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106155
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
