Somebody's working on it: https://launchpad.net/~eclipse-team/+archive/ppa One could say that it isn't difficult to install eclipse manually, but imho it's bad school of thought: one could say that about 70% of software.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Oli <o...@thepcspy.com> wrote: > We're quickly approaching two years since this bug was launched, many > people have said things but nothing has come from it to get a proper > package-build-process started. Considering how many developers use > Eclipse (for so many different things), I would have put money on this > being fixed 18 months ago... And I would have lost. > > So apart from people randomly assigning this to random groups > (Medibuntu? wtf?!), what's going on? People appear to be taking this on, > finding it doesn't build and eventually giving up. Is there any way we > can elevate this from a community bug to a proper Canonical "we can't > release Karmic with E3.2" bug? > > Because shipping Eclipse 3.2 in Intrepid and Jaunty is a complete joke. > Shipping it in Karmic is just lazy. If we can't do it as a community, > lets get Canonical and Sun talking to resolve this issue before we start > getting laughed at. > > -- > Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2 > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in “eclipse” source package in Ubuntu: Confirmed > Status in “eclipse” source package in Baltix: New > Status in “eclipse” source package in Debian: New > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: eclipse > > Eclipse 3.4.2 is now out - maybe we could see this in Jaunty? > > [was: Eclipse 3.3/3.4/3.4.1 is out, maybe we could see this in > Gutsy/Intrepid?] > -- M. Modrzejewski -- Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs