On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Axx83 <axxaxx83-l...@yahoo.it> wrote:
> what kind of non disclosure agreement could there be on an open source
> implementation of a probably patented technology ??? If it's open source
> and if the hardware is patented of course.
>
> Really I don't understand the issue, if someone needs a legal analysis
> of this issue I could work on it with some help. But from a brief look
> it seems illogical.

It doesn't seem like all the facts are out in the open. GregKH claims
he /knows/ the information was obtained illegally [1], which Shem
disputes [2].

[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/7/403
[2] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/7/428

-- 
Intrepid: Missing hdaps_ec kernel module
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297213
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to