On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Axx83 <axxaxx83-l...@yahoo.it> wrote: > what kind of non disclosure agreement could there be on an open source > implementation of a probably patented technology ??? If it's open source > and if the hardware is patented of course. > > Really I don't understand the issue, if someone needs a legal analysis > of this issue I could work on it with some help. But from a brief look > it seems illogical.
It doesn't seem like all the facts are out in the open. GregKH claims he /knows/ the information was obtained illegally [1], which Shem disputes [2]. [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/7/403 [2] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/7/428 -- Intrepid: Missing hdaps_ec kernel module https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297213 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs