Matthew Paul Thomas said:
> For example, I'm at a loss to understand why you think a notification bubble
> "timed to appear periodically" above everything else would be less annoying
> than a window that opens once and then sits in the background until you deal
> with it.

For several reasons...  A pop-under application has multiple problems,
already mentioned: as a pop-under it may not be noticed, if it appears
on only one workspace it may not be noticed, and an application window
that was not initiated by the user is likely to be dismissed by the user
to get it out of the way.  And if it *is* closed, the user gets no
further reminder of the available updates until further updates are
released, regardless of the importance of the current updates.

Periodic OSD notification avoids each of these problems.  It appears on
the current workspace in a noticeable but unobtrusive way, stays for
just long enough to deliver its message, then disappears.  If the period
is sufficiently long enough -- and especially if that period is
configurable by the user (perhaps anywhere from once and hour to once a
day, and upon login) -- then it remains a reminder rather than a nagging
annoyance.  And if it is coupled with a notification area icon, then the
user has an unobtrusive persistent notification of any available updates
in addition to the intermittent transient reminder of important updates.
If you think of the OSD notification as reminders, with the notification
area icon as the actual control, then it doesn't really violate the rule
of direct manipulation -- the OSD wouldn't be prompting you to take
action, but only reminding you that an action is available.

-- 
[Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332945
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to