Actually, in addition to that could you please link me to where the differences in character types are discusses for xorg? I've not heard of that distinction before and am curious to learn more.
-Mike On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Mike Jones <eternal...@gmail.com> wrote: > So Jens, I'm sorry if you felt I was accusing you, but I was asking how you > knew, not accusing you of being wrong. From the amount of knowledge I have, > which yes, is limited, I have no idea how you were able to verify what you > did. > > Also, the text that you are telling me is incorrect, was text I copied > into my xorg without suffering any issue. So I'm, again, not sure where > exactly your getting your information from. If for some reason the method by > which I copied the text from somehow corrected my own error, I would really > appreciate if you would point that out to me. However, I don't think that > the tone of your reply, that is, if I'm interpreting it correctly, is really > appropriate. > > -Mike > > > On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Jens Ropers <rop...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2009/5/8 Michael Jones <eternal...@gmail.com>: >> > How exactly are you able to verify that when you received the >> information >> > from a website that undoubtedly modified the input it was given to be >> > correctly represented internally, and then transmitted to be displayed >> on an >> > unknown browser that operates on an unknown operating system? >> >> Oh cop on. *You* provided the info. It would have been proper for >> *you* to verify that what you're posting is actually useful and >> doesn't contain erroneous characters. It ain't rocket science. I >> checked the characters you provided and detected that they were wrong; >> you ought to have done just that, *before posting them*. But hey, we >> all make mistakes, so it's entirely understandable and forgivable -- >> just don't be defensive about your little screw-up. >> >> > My suggestion is that a user types the xorg.conf information into >> xorg.conf >> manually. its only a few lines, and alleviates any issue with correct type >> settings. >> >> My suggestion is that you're more diligent next time and don't try to >> pass the buck and blame for your mistakes to others. >> >> -- >> REISUB is broken >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303601 >> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber >> of a duplicate bug. >> >> Status in “linux” source package in Ubuntu: Confirmed >> >> Bug description: >> Now, I'm not sure if this is in all installs of Intrepid or just some of >> them, but somehow the magic SysRq keys stopped working on several installs >> of Intrepd Ibex. I don't know what causes it, but it becomes very apparent >> thanks to Compiz Fusion somehow locking up the entire operating system. >> >> A test of REISUB on this system when it is working shows none of it works >> (In fact, I got flooded by gnome-screenshot, indicating pretty clearly the >> magic keys are somehow disabled.) >> >> I need bug confirmation, which means that if this problem has shown up in >> other systems, it's likely a bug and not some problem I caused. >> > > -- REISUB is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303601 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
