I have the same question as Thomas. I see the karmic tag in the fix applied. Why not make it available to Jaunty since that is where the problem is?
Also, we've released Mapnik 0.6.0 which **ideally** should be the package available in Karmic, if not Mapnik 0.6.1 (due out in several weeks). Thoughts? I'm new to learning about this packaging and would benefit from a sense of who things work. Also, would it be possible in Karmic to provide two python-mapnik packages? One built against python2.5/boost_python-mt-py25.so and one against python2.6/boost-python-mt-py26? This would be really really useful for integrating Mapnik with QuantumGIS, which depends on Python2.5 Thoughts on that? -- mapnik-python does not build against default python https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354205 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
