@Martin: If ping <any name> fails, I wonder if the DNS redirection opt-
out has somehow effectively "opted out" of *all* DNS resolution?  That
could explain why ping yahoo.com (for example) now fails.  Can you still
browse the web, deal with email, etc as normal once "opted out" from the
DNS redirection?  If you can, then at least some names are resolving OK.

Did you mean that ping <any local machine name> now fails, but remote
DNS registered hostnames/domains (like ping yahoo.com ) still work fine?

If it is just local machine names that are failing to resolve, then I
suspect you can either:

 (a) add the machine names and their IPs manually to your hosts file(s)
or to the DNS zonefile for your local (internal) DNS domain, or into
WINS if there is a WINS server in the picture

and/or (more work up front, but probably better and less maintenance
once set up)

 (b) arrange for the DHCP server to dynamically update your local DNS
server, so that the name and IP of each Windows machine that receives a
DHCP-provided IP address appears as a hostname there.  If the DHCP
server and DNS server are a Windows 2003 server, this is essentially
"automatic"; if you are using Ubuntu for these services, you'll have to
do some configuration work to get it to behave this way, as far as I
know.

One more thought: If "ping server" fails but "ping
server.mydomain.local" works, then the default DNS resolver search
probably needs changing to include your domain name (search
mydomain.local in my example).  You can edit this in /etc/resolv.conf .

Getting rid of your DNS redirection was a big step in the right
direction.

-- 
cannot browse samba shares without editing smb.conf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375593
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to