On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 04:26:20AM -0000, Hyperfitz wrote:
> Wow, this is constructive. For the record, there is nothing wrong with my
> file system. There is, however, something wrong with the check that happens
> at boot. It is not user error, sorry if you think otherwise--doesn't change
> the facts. My suggestion is hardly (in the slightest) like telling people to
> drive around without seat belts. You ought to know just a little bit more
> about people before you simply start insulting them, Theodore. You know
> nothing about me--not one little thing.
The problem is there's not enough information to do anything
interesting with your report. You can't even tell me what errors were
being reported by fsck.
In the case of the original bug reporter, it was clear that there was
a confusion caused by Ubuntu labelling multiple filesystems with the
label name "/". I don't know what's going on with your case. But I
can say that no other users from any other distributions have reported
anything like this. So I'm pretty confident it is either user error
or some other kind of confusion.
In any case, this bug report was marked as incomplete over a year ago
due to a lack of information, and I am now unsubscribing from this bug
report as it is clear there is no intelligent life here. If someone
else wants to report a related issue, please open a new bug with full
details if you want any help. If you want to just vent about how
unfair life is, and how much Ubuntu, or e2fsprogs sucks, please feel
free to do it where you want. If you want to suggest to people that
deleting fsck binaries are a sane thing to do, I don't want to have
any involvement in it, as that will only lead to tears.
- Ted
--
filesystem check fails on boot, but filesystem isn't bad
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48563
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
