Ah well I see. But I just found a problem. The fdi file shipped with the debian file does not contain any matching except info.subsystem "usb". This is because print-camera-list is built with a libtool wrapper script that seems to be used during package building instead of the final binary file. This should not, but indeed does, produce a different output than the final binary file which is located in packaging/generic/.libs/print-camera-list after building. Possibly the udev file is also generated Besides that, there is another problem. If I use the correct print-camera-list program with the hal-fdi argument, the fdi file is generated BUT the matching for Apple iPhones is still incorrect, using usb.interface.class=0, usb.interface.subclass=0, and usb.interface.protocol=0. Attached is the corrected patch from above using 6:1:1.
@Marcus: You should fix this in libgphoto2 SVN, too. @Martin: Perhaps you should use ./packaging/generic/.libs/print-camera-list udev-rules [...] and ./packaging/generic/.libs/print-camera-list hal-fdi instead of ./packaging/generic/print-camera-list udev-rules [...] and ./packaging/generic/print-camera-list hal-fdi inside the debian/rules file which worked for me. ** Attachment added: "xx-corrected.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27908913/xx-corrected.patch -- Please package changes in r12140..12143 (iPhone/Touch) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386002 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
