Hi. The situation that you are complaining about is that vrms takes into account the section of the packages.
In general, if the section of a package doesn't match what its copyright says, then the package has a bug and it should be fixed ASAP. If the section of a package in Ubuntu matches the policy of what Ubuntu considers free and non-free (i.e., restricted or multiverse), then vrms will work perfectly according to what the users of Ubuntu expect. BTW, despite being a Debian Maintainer, I use Ubuntu exclusively on a laptop of mine that I use daily---and I'm testing it with karmic. There is, in my view, no need to keep patches to vrms confined in Ubuntu. I think that I will close this bug with a new upload of vrms (which I hope is considered by inclusion in time for karmic's release). Regards, Rogério Brito. -- Rogério Brito : rbr...@{mackenzie,ime.usp}.br : GPG key 1024D/7C2CAEB8 http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito : http://meusite.mackenzie.com.br/rbrito Projects: algorithms.berlios.de : lame.sf.net : vrms.alioth.debian.org -- CC-by-sa reported as non-free https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144006 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs