Hi.

The situation that you are complaining about is that vrms takes into
account the section of the packages.

In general, if the section of a package doesn't match what its copyright
says, then the package has a bug and it should be fixed ASAP.

If the section of a package in Ubuntu matches the policy of what Ubuntu
considers free and non-free (i.e., restricted or multiverse), then vrms
will work perfectly according to what the users of Ubuntu expect.

BTW, despite being a Debian Maintainer, I use Ubuntu exclusively on a
laptop of mine that I use daily---and I'm testing it with karmic.

There is, in my view, no need to keep patches to vrms confined in
Ubuntu.

I think that I will close this bug with a new upload of vrms (which I
hope is considered by inclusion in time for karmic's release).


Regards, Rogério Brito.

-- 
Rogério Brito : rbr...@{mackenzie,ime.usp}.br : GPG key 1024D/7C2CAEB8
http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito : http://meusite.mackenzie.com.br/rbrito
Projects: algorithms.berlios.de : lame.sf.net : vrms.alioth.debian.org

-- 
CC-by-sa reported as non-free
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144006
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to