Thanks for agreeing with me on this case On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 20:14 +0000, Steve Langasek wrote: > Well in that case, I'm marking the gdm Ubuntu task as invalid. The > Debian shadow maintainer has agreed that /etc/securetty should mark > these X displays as trusted. This hasn't entirely been implemented yet > since fusa jumps straight to :20 as its next display number and > /etc/securetty only goes up to :3 currently, so this still needs to be > implemented (either by supporting wildcards in pam or by listing out all > the displays in /etc/securetty), but in either case no code can or > should be changed in gdm for this. > > ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) > Status: Fix Committed => Invalid > > ** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu) > Importance: Undecided => Medium >
-- users with no password can't log in with gdm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104957 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
