All of the source files are licensed under the LGPL (2.1) with 3 exceptions: src/parse.c, src/parse.h, and src/pam/pam_cgroup.c
Those files have licenses in the comment header, parse.[ch] specifies GPL and pam_cgroup.c specifies BSD-3 (or GPL) The discussion on REVU revolves around properly documenting each file and its associated license in 'debian/copyright'. So nearly all of the source is licensed under the LGPL with the exceptions stated above, the effort is to capture those exceptions in the documentation, not to re- interpret or to change the licensing in any way. Does this make sense? Jump on IRC if you have a sec, we can discuss further. -- [needs-packaging] libcgroup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
