Here is the change log entry from the link I posted above:

Date:   Mon Aug 17 14:34:59 2009 -0700
 
    clockevent: Prevent dead lock on clockevents_lock
    
    Currently clockevents_notify() is called with interrupts enabled at
    some places and interrupts disabled at some other places.
    
    This results in a deadlock in this scenario.
    
    cpu A holds clockevents_lock in clockevents_notify() with irqs enabled
    cpu B waits for clockevents_lock in clockevents_notify() with irqs disabled
    cpu C doing set_mtrr() which will try to rendezvous of all the cpus.
    
    This will result in C and A come to the rendezvous point and waiting
    for B. B is stuck forever waiting for the spinlock and thus not
    reaching the rendezvous point.
    
    Fix the clockevents code so that clockevents_lock is taken with
    interrupts disabled and thus avoid the above deadlock.
    
    Also call lapic_timer_propagate_broadcast() on the destination cpu so
    that we avoid calling smp_call_function() in the clockevents notifier
    chain.
    
    This issue left us wondering if we need to change the MTRR rendezvous
    logic to use stop machine logic (instead of smp_call_function) or add
    a check in spinlock debug code to see if there are other spinlocks
    which gets taken under both interrupts enabled/disabled conditions.
    
    Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.sid...@intel.com>
    Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallip...@intel.com>
    Cc: "Pallipadi Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallip...@intel.com>
    Cc: "Brown Len" <len.br...@intel.com>
    LKML-Reference: <1250544899.2709.210.ca...@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com>
    Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>

-- 
Server 8.04 LTS: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 11s! [bond1:3795] - bond - bond0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245779
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to