I've been running with the "anticipatory" scheduler for a long time now. The same bug drove me to experiment with the schedulers. Responsiveness under heavy I/O is much better than with CFQ
Every once in a while (when changing kernels) I try CFQ again, without luck. I know CFQ has a few kernel params that we can play with but that's beyond my knowledge unfortunately so I just stuck to using "anticipatory". -- CFQ may not be the right choice of i/o scheduler for the most common desktop systems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427210 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
