On 09/15/2009 07:55 PM, Ryan wrote: [snip]> > 2. With such a large change (touching so many areas) with such risk > ('average' testers unable to boot/recover without a lot launchpad visits > after rescue usb/cd)... Was this tested as set via a PPA etc first and > somehow everyone running via the PPA just had zero issues? - Or was it > direct to test on all the 'normal' alpha uses using the normal repos? >
The packages were released via the ubuntu-boot team PPAs and tested without major issues. The problem was not the packages, the problem was the buildds not being happy in the middle of moving the packages into the archive. With that said, a discussion has started on how we can modify update-manager, so that in the future we can basically stop users from upgrading packages when we know the archive is foobar'd. -- Boot Performance Updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs